AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE
AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEA.DE returned 11.07%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEA.DE achieves a 31.99% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEA.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 11.07%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 34.41%
- 1Y
- 55.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 63.41%
- 1Y
- 126.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -15.34% | 1.62% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.47% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011 | 0.65 |
The correlation between AMEA.DE and LSMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEA.DE
LSMC.DE
AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.59 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 10.37 | -5.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.16 | 32.83 | -15.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 4.27 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.15 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 1.09 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.82 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.43% | -39.77% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -12.53% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.48% | -36.22% | +15.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.78% | -39.77% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -39.77% | +6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -3.34% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -9.37% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.96% | -0.75% |
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) is 8.10%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that AMEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 11.23% | -3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 22.18% | -6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 30.40% | -11.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 31.21% | -12.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 26.06% | -7.09% |
AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEA.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEA.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
AMEA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEA.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEA.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer