AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE
AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) and FLXI.DE (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while FLXI.DE tracks the FTSE India 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMEA.DE returned 8.87%/yr vs 5.31%/yr for FLXI.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXI.DE.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEA.DE achieves a 31.99% return, which is significantly higher than FLXI.DE's -9.32% return.
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 32.57%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
FLXI.DE
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -9.32%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- -11.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- —
AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -15.34% | 1.62% | 15.62% | 11.28% |
FLXI.DE Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | -9.32% | -8.72% | 16.97% | 17.26% | -1.79% | 35.49% | 1.89% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and FLXI.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019 | 0.52 |
The correlation between AMEA.DE and FLXI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEA.DE
FLXI.DE
AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEA.DE | FLXI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 0.88 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | -0.66 | +5.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.16 | -1.44 | +18.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEA.DE | FLXI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | -0.79 | +3.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.33 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.33 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, smaller than the maximum FLXI.DE drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and FLXI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEA.DE | FLXI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.43% | -40.58% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -17.48% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.48% | -24.76% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.78% | -24.76% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -21.26% | +18.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -7.78% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 8.08% | -4.87% |
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) at 5.52%. This indicates that AMEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEA.DE | FLXI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 5.52% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 12.18% | +3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 14.69% | +4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 15.77% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 19.96% | -0.99% |
AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXI.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. FLXI.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEA.DE nor FLXI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEA.DE and FLXI.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXI.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXI.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while FLXI.DE tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEA.DE and 0.19% for FLXI.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEA.DE and FLXI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer