AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS
AMDI.L (IncomeShares AMD Options ETP) and WINC.AS (iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc) are both exchange-traded funds - AMDI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while WINC.AS is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDI.L returned 100.82% vs 21.61% for WINC.AS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMDI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WINC.AS.
Performance
AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDI.L achieves a 81.71% return, which is significantly higher than WINC.AS's 9.43% return.
AMDI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -10.31%
- 6M
- 73.37%
- YTD
- 81.71%
- 1Y
- 100.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19,255.63%
WINC.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.13%
AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 81.71% | 12,701.59% |
WINC.AS iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 9.43% | 11.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDI.L and WINC.AS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS — Risk / Return Rank
AMDI.L
WINC.AS
AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMDI.L | WINC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.15 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.62 | 12.97 | -9.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.34%, which is greater than WINC.AS's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDI.L and WINC.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDI.L | WINC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.34% | -14.81% | -32.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.34% | -6.77% | -40.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.92% | -1.03% | -15.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.04% | -1.45% | -19.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.81% | 1.65% | +26.16% |
Volatility
AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a higher volatility of 25.65% compared to iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc (WINC.AS) at 2.63%. This indicates that AMDI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WINC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDI.L | WINC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.65% | 2.63% | +23.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.18% | 8.87% | +38.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.40% | 10.87% | +64.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,750.24% | 12.52% | +9,737.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,750.24% | 12.52% | +9,737.72% |
AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WINC.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDI.L vs. WINC.AS - Dividend Comparison
AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.97%, more than WINC.AS's 9.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP | 52.97% | 8.85% | 0.00% |
WINC.AS iShares World Equity High Income UCITS ETF USD Inc | 9.88% | 9.38% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDI.L and WINC.AS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WINC.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WINC.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AMDI.L.
AMDI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while WINC.AS is Global Equity Income. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AMDI.L and 0.35% for WINC.AS.
Find the right allocation for AMDI.L and WINC.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer