AMDI.L vs. FEPG.L

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

AMDI.L (IncomeShares AMD Options ETP) and FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPG.L.

Performance

AMDI.L vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDI.L achieves a 81.71% return, which is significantly higher than FEPG.L's -3.44% return.

AMDI.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -10.31%
• 6M: 73.37%
• YTD: 81.71%
• 1Y: 100.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19,255.63%

FEPG.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.73%
• 6M: 0.07%
• YTD: -3.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDI.L vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP	81.71%	4.93%
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF	-3.44%	8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDI.L and FEPG.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

AMDI.L vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDI.L

AMDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AMDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
AMDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
AMDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
AMDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FEPG.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDI.L vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDI.L	FEPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.62	—	—

Drawdowns

AMDI.L vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.34%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDI.L and FEPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDI.L	FEPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.34%	-35.75%	-11.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.92%	-28.16%	+11.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.04%	-20.83%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDI.L	FEPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.40%	45.69%	+29.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9,750.24%	45.69%	+9,704.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9,750.24%	45.69%	+9,704.55%

AMDI.L vs. FEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FEPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDI.L vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison

AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.97%, more than FEPG.L's 27.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDI.L IncomeShares AMD Options ETP	52.97%	8.85%
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF	27.80%	11.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDI.L and FEPG.L in my portfolio?

AMDI.L and FEPG.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMDI.L or FEPG.L?

On fees, AMDI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDI.L or FEPG.L?

AMDI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FEPG.L.

What is the main difference between AMDI.L and FEPG.L?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AMDI.L and 0.65% for FEPG.L.