PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMDI.L is traded in USD, while EXV1.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EXV1.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDI.L achieves a 81.71% return, which is significantly higher than EXV1.DE's 14.62% return.


AMDI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-10.31%
6M
73.37%
YTD
81.71%
1Y
100.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19,255.63%

EXV1.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.46%
6M
12.74%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
49.24%
3Y*
44.42%
5Y*
31.63%
10Y*
16.85%
ALL TIME*
1.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMDI.L
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP
81.71%12,701.59%
EXV1.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE)
14.62%31.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDI.L and EXV1.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDI.L
AMDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EXV1.DE
EXV1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EXV1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) and iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDI.LEXV1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.76

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

9.13

-5.50

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the EXV1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDI.L and EXV1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.34%, smaller than the maximum EXV1.DE drawdown of -83.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDI.L and EXV1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDI.LEXV1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.34%

-83.64%

+36.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.34%

-17.78%

-29.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.92%

-1.84%

-15.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-57.60%

+36.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.81%

5.38%

+22.43%

Volatility

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a higher volatility of 25.65% compared to iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE) at 5.53%. This indicates that AMDI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXV1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDI.LEXV1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.65%

5.53%

+20.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.18%

20.42%

+26.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.40%

23.78%

+51.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9,750.24%

25.46%

+9,724.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9,750.24%

25.99%

+9,724.25%

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EXV1.DE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDI.L vs. EXV1.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMDI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.97%, more than EXV1.DE's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMDI.L
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP
52.97%8.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXV1.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE)
3.58%3.63%5.51%4.53%6.37%1.06%1.52%4.31%4.03%6.01%3.49%3.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDI.L and EXV1.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXV1.DE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXV1.DE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AMDI.L.

AMDI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while EXV1.DE is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AMDI.L and 0.47% for EXV1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDI.L and EXV1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer