AMDG vs. NFLU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) and NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMDG returned 333.53% vs -68.87% for NFLU. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMDG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NFLU.

Performance

AMDG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDG achieves a 241.41% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -47.84% return.

AMDG

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: -17.54%
• 6M: 167.35%
• YTD: 241.41%
• 1Y: 333.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 248.00%

NFLU

• 1D: 4.51%
• 1M: -12.87%
• 6M: -32.24%
• YTD: -47.84%
• 1Y: -68.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -18.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	$7.65M	$7.77M	$8.81M
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	$3.07M	$4.96M	$4.46M

AMDG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	241.41%	95.49%
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-47.84%	-26.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDG and NFLU is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	0.09

The correlation between AMDG and NFLU shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMDG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 87
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMDG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDG	NFLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	-0.99	+3.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	-1.73	+4.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	0.78	+0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.95	-0.89	+6.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.16	-1.40	+12.56

AMDG vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the NFLU Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDG and NFLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMDG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDG drawdown since its inception was -63.32%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -80.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDG and NFLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDG	NFLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.32%	-80.45%	+17.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.48%	-77.14%	+20.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.40%	-77.23%	+41.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.07%	-32.10%	+7.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.06%	49.03%	-18.97%

Volatility

AMDG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a higher volatility of 48.57% compared to T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) at 21.78%. This indicates that AMDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDG	NFLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	48.57%	21.78%	+26.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	112.40%	56.17%	+56.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	142.88%	70.10%	+72.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	135.04%	69.65%	+65.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	135.04%	69.65%	+65.39%

AMDG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, while NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	3.28%	11.21%
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDG and NFLU in my portfolio?

AMDG and NFLU have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMDG or NFLU?

AMDG has higher volatility (48.57%) compared to NFLU (21.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDG dropped -63.32% vs NFLU's -80.45%.

Which ETF is better, AMDG or NFLU?

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 333.53% vs -68.87% for NFLU. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 21.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMDG or NFLU?

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 333.53% return vs -68.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDG or NFLU?

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDG or NFLU?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

What is the main difference between AMDG and NFLU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMDG and 1.05% for NFLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.