PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDG vs. NFLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDG achieves a 391.03% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -32.34% return.


AMDG

1D
7.70%
1M
134.89%
YTD
391.03%
6M
367.32%
1Y
1,172.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLU

1D
-4.65%
1M
-21.10%
YTD
-32.34%
6M
-45.65%
1Y
-64.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMDG and NFLU is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025

0.16

The correlation between AMDG and NFLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLU
NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMDGNFLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

0.79

+0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.99

-0.90

+21.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.10

-1.40

+42.49

AMDG vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDG Sharpe Ratio is 9.15, which is higher than the NFLU Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDG and NFLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMDGNFLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.15

-0.97

+10.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.36

-0.10

+3.46

Drawdowns

AMDG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDG drawdown since its inception was -63.04%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDG and NFLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDGNFLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.04%

-72.10%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.48%

-72.10%

+15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-70.46%

+70.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.70%

-27.92%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.80%

46.27%

-17.47%

Volatility

AMDG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a higher volatility of 45.35% compared to T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) at 14.50%. This indicates that AMDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDGNFLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.35%

14.50%

+30.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.94%

51.32%

+43.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.64%

66.63%

+63.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

130.26%

69.18%

+61.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.26%

69.18%

+61.08%

AMDG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while NFLU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMDG and NFLU have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDG has higher volatility (45.35%) compared to NFLU (14.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDG dropped -63.04% vs NFLU's -72.10%.

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 1172.87% vs -64.65% for NFLU. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 14.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 1172.87% return vs -64.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for NFLU.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMDG and 1.05% for NFLU.

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.15 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDG and NFLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer