AMDG vs. EEV
AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) and EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AMDG is actively managed, while EEV is passively managed. Over the past year, AMDG returned 1172.87% vs -60.04% for EEV. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. AMDG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EEV.
Performance
AMDG vs. EEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDG achieves a 391.03% return, which is significantly higher than EEV's -42.06% return.
AMDG
- 1D
- 7.70%
- 1M
- 134.89%
- YTD
- 391.03%
- 6M
- 367.32%
- 1Y
- 1,172.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEV
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -17.39%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 6M
- -44.23%
- 1Y
- -60.04%
- 3Y*
- -34.25%
- 5Y*
- -15.62%
- 10Y*
- -24.13%
AMDG vs. EEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 391.03% | 96.98% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -42.06% | -40.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDG and EEV is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2025 | -0.57 |
The correlation between AMDG and EEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.57 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDG vs. EEV — Risk / Return Rank
AMDG
EEV
AMDG vs. EEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMDG | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +10.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 0.69 | +0.94 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.99 | -1.01 | +22.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.10 | -1.85 | +42.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMDG | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.15 | -1.49 | +10.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.36 | -0.48 | +3.84 |
Drawdowns
AMDG vs. EEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDG drawdown since its inception was -63.04%, smaller than the maximum EEV drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDG and EEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDG | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.04% | -99.87% | +36.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.48% | -59.83% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -76.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -80.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -99.87% | +99.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.70% | -93.00% | +67.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.80% | 34.15% | -5.35% |
Volatility
AMDG vs. EEV - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a higher volatility of 45.35% compared to ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) at 17.59%. This indicates that AMDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDG | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 45.35% | 17.59% | +27.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.94% | 35.59% | +59.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 129.64% | 40.37% | +89.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 130.26% | 38.25% | +92.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 130.26% | 41.13% | +89.13% |
AMDG vs. EEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EEV's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDG vs. EEV - Dividend Comparison
AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than EEV's 7.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 2.28% | 11.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.46% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDG and EEV have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDG has higher volatility (45.35%) compared to EEV (17.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDG dropped -63.04% vs EEV's -99.87%.
On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 1172.87% vs -60.04% for EEV. On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EEV has been the lower-risk option at 17.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 1172.87% return vs -60.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EEV.
EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 2.28% for AMDG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMDG and 0.95% for EEV.
AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.15 vs -1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMDG and EEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer