AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Advanced Micro Devices CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMD.TO) and Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO).

Performance

AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Advanced Micro Devices CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMD.TO) and Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMD.TO Advanced Micro Devices CDR (CAD Hedged)	-5.48%	86.42%
NVDA.TO Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)	-7.11%	46.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMD.TO achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA.TO's -7.11% return.

AMD.TO

• 1D: 4.02%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: -5.48%
• 6M: 24.08%
• 1Y: 93.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDA.TO

• 1D: 5.36%
• 1M: -1.92%
• YTD: -7.11%
• 6M: -7.69%
• 1Y: 57.28%
• 3Y*: 80.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMD.TO

AMD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
AMD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
AMD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AMD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AMD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
AMD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

NVDA.TO

NVDA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
NVDA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
NVDA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NVDA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NVDA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advanced Micro Devices CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMD.TO) and Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMD.TO	NVDA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.45	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.14	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.27	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	2.61	+0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.62	6.55	+0.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the NVDA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMD.TO and NVDA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMD.TO	NVDA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.45	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	1.14	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between AMD.TO and NVDA.TO is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Dividend Comparison

AMD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMD.TO Advanced Micro Devices CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA.TO Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.03%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.11%

Drawdowns

AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMD.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.90%, smaller than the maximum NVDA.TO drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMD.TO and NVDA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMD.TO	NVDA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.90%	-61.15%	+29.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.44%	-21.05%	-7.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.89%	-16.81%	-7.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.34%	-15.69%	+4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.92%	8.38%	+5.54%

Volatility

AMD.TO vs. NVDA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Advanced Micro Devices CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMD.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to Nvidia CDR (CAD Hedged) (NVDA.TO) at 10.05%. This indicates that AMD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMD.TO	NVDA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.40%	10.05%	+6.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.92%	24.70%	+24.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.11%	39.74%	+24.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.75%	52.19%	+9.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.75%	52.19%	+9.56%

Financials