AMAGX vs. FTQGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMAGX (Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares) and FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AMAGX returned 17.87%/yr vs 20.05%/yr for FTQGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.86% expense ratio.

Performance

AMAGX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAGX achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 32.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAGX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 17.87%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.05% annualized return.

AMAGX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: 33.72%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 17.87%

FTQGX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 9.32%
• YTD: 32.36%
• 6M: 30.89%
• 1Y: 55.95%
• 3Y*: 31.26%
• 5Y*: 16.84%
• 10Y*: 20.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAGX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares	15.11%	17.62%	15.73%	25.67%	-19.49%	31.51%	32.93%	33.09%	2.47%	28.91%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	32.36%	13.65%	36.95%	28.94%	-26.68%	26.91%	33.41%	31.44%	4.90%	30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAGX and FTQGX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1996	0.89

The correlation between AMAGX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMAGX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAGX

AMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 63
AMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
AMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
AMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FTQGX

FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAGX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMAGX	FTQGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.70	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.38	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.46	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	4.51	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.55	18.97	-5.42

AMAGX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAGX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMAGX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAGX drawdown since its inception was -57.64%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAGX and FTQGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAGX	FTQGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.64%	-61.29%	+3.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.04%	-12.76%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.45%	-26.84%	+5.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.09%	-32.31%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.09%	-32.31%	+4.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	0.00%	-1.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	-14.17%	+3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	3.03%	-0.46%

Volatility

AMAGX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares (AMAGX) is 6.15%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that AMAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMAGX	FTQGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	8.87%	-2.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.69%	16.95%	-3.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.92%	21.35%	-4.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.55%	21.95%	-3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	21.72%	-3.22%

AMAGX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMAGX and FTQGX have an expense ratio of 0.86%.

Dividends

AMAGX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAGX Amana Growth Fund Investor Shares	0.00%	0.00%	3.95%	0.65%	3.64%	0.52%	5.44%	3.15%	3.47%	10.90%	13.67%	7.45%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	9.40%	12.44%	9.94%	0.61%	7.96%	13.53%	11.41%	5.07%	14.71%	5.89%	1.08%	5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMAGX and FTQGX in my portfolio?

AMAGX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMAGX or FTQGX?

FTQGX has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to AMAGX (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAGX dropped -57.64% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.