PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAGX vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAGX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAGX achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 36.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAGX has outperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 17.66%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.79% annualized return.


AMAGX

1D
-0.54%
1M
5.94%
YTD
16.77%
6M
15.32%
1Y
36.21%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*
17.66%

FSENX

1D
1.00%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
36.38%
6M
32.95%
1Y
56.07%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
22.18%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAGX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMAGX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund
16.77%17.62%15.73%25.67%-19.49%31.51%32.93%33.09%2.47%28.91%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
36.38%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAGX and FSENX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 1994

0.48

The correlation between AMAGX and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAGX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAGX
AMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAGX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAGXFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

5.35

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

15.73

-0.80

AMAGX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAGX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAGXFSENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.71

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.82

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

0.32

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.32

+0.36

Drawdowns

AMAGX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAGX drawdown since its inception was -57.64%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAGX and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAGXFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.64%

-76.24%

+18.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-9.95%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.45%

-25.85%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-28.02%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.09%

-72.11%

+44.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-4.14%

+3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-17.01%

+6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.38%

-0.90%

Volatility

AMAGX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) is 4.92%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that AMAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMAGXFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

7.62%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

15.36%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

19.69%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

27.26%

-8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

30.96%

-12.54%

AMAGX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMAGX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAGX
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%3.95%0.65%3.64%0.52%5.44%3.15%3.47%10.90%13.67%7.45%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.57%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAGX and FSENX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSENX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to AMAGX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAGX dropped -57.64% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAGX and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer