PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTFX vs. UCEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTFX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTFX achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 13.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ALTFX having a 11.36% annualized return and UCEQX not far ahead at 11.59%.


ALTFX

1D
-0.85%
1M
3.40%
YTD
4.84%
6M
3.62%
1Y
8.64%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
11.36%

UCEQX

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.24%
YTD
13.72%
6M
14.35%
1Y
30.58%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTFX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
4.84%6.22%5.94%15.97%-27.19%22.64%39.40%33.60%-9.86%37.16%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
13.72%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%10.76%22.49%-12.06%22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTFX and UCEQX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012

0.91

The correlation between ALTFX and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTFX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTFX
ALTFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ALTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTFX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALTFXUCEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

3.45

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

15.48

-13.81

ALTFX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTFX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALTFXUCEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

2.52

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.72

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.70

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.69

-0.41

Drawdowns

ALTFX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTFX drawdown since its inception was -80.01%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTFX and UCEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTFXUCEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.01%

-35.33%

-44.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-8.96%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-15.64%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

-25.24%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.87%

-35.33%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.68%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-4.87%

-32.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

1.99%

+3.29%

Volatility

ALTFX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) at 3.72%. This indicates that ALTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTFXUCEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

3.72%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

9.72%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

12.27%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

15.27%

+2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

16.50%

+1.55%

ALTFX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTFX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

ALTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.90%, more than UCEQX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
12.90%13.53%8.18%0.03%2.61%9.99%7.23%6.01%8.36%0.00%4.05%0.00%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.46%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ALTFX and UCEQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ALTFX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to UCEQX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTFX dropped -80.01% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTFX and UCEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer