PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTFX vs. SCRZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTFX vs. SCRZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTFX achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCRZX's 16.20% return. Over the past 10 years, ALTFX has outperformed SCRZX with an annualized return of 11.46%, while SCRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.77% annualized return.


ALTFX

1D
0.54%
1M
5.67%
YTD
5.73%
6M
4.98%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
11.46%

SCRZX

1D
0.74%
1M
3.59%
YTD
16.20%
6M
14.94%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
9.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTFX vs. SCRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
5.73%6.22%5.94%15.97%-27.19%22.64%39.40%33.60%-9.86%37.16%
SCRZX
AB Small Cap Core Portfolio
16.20%7.75%7.72%20.91%-18.89%23.27%12.41%24.28%-13.25%7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTFX and SCRZX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.79

The correlation between ALTFX and SCRZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTFX vs. SCRZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTFX
ALTFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ALTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SCRZX
SCRZX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SCRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SCRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTFX vs. SCRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALTFXSCRZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

3.56

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

12.21

-10.26

ALTFX vs. SCRZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the SCRZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTFX and SCRZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALTFXSCRZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.82

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.31

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.42

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.42

-0.14

Drawdowns

ALTFX vs. SCRZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTFX drawdown since its inception was -80.01%, which is greater than SCRZX's maximum drawdown of -44.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTFX and SCRZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTFXSCRZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.01%

-44.82%

-35.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-9.37%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-28.46%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

-29.24%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.87%

-44.82%

+8.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-8.65%

-28.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

2.73%

+2.55%

Volatility

ALTFX vs. SCRZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) is 4.89%, while AB Small Cap Core Portfolio (SCRZX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that ALTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTFXSCRZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

5.17%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

12.87%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

18.34%

-3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

22.04%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

23.23%

-5.18%

ALTFX vs. SCRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SCRZX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTFX vs. SCRZX - Dividend Comparison

ALTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.80%, more than SCRZX's 9.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
12.80%13.53%8.18%0.03%2.61%9.99%7.23%6.01%8.36%0.00%4.05%
SCRZX
AB Small Cap Core Portfolio
9.24%10.74%15.00%8.51%8.47%5.95%0.51%0.47%8.63%6.37%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTFX and SCRZX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCRZX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to ALTFX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTFX dropped -80.01% vs SCRZX's -44.82%.

SCRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTFX and SCRZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer