PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALTFX vs. RTXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALTFX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTFX achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 16.52% return.


ALTFX

1D
0.54%
1M
5.67%
YTD
5.73%
6M
4.98%
1Y
9.72%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
11.46%

RTXAX

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
16.52%
6M
16.24%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALTFX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
5.73%6.22%5.94%15.97%-27.19%22.64%39.40%12.94%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
16.52%13.56%1.50%7.40%-11.66%26.57%3.73%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ALTFX and RTXAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2019

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between ALTFX and RTXAX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALTFX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTFX
ALTFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ALTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXAX
RTXAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RTXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTFX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALTFXRTXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.45

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

5.36

-4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

20.98

-19.04

ALTFX vs. RTXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALTFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the RTXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTFX and RTXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALTFXRTXAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

2.59

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.41

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.43

-0.15

Drawdowns

ALTFX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTFX drawdown since its inception was -80.01%, which is greater than RTXAX's maximum drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTFX and RTXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALTFXRTXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.01%

-40.68%

-39.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-5.21%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-17.13%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

-24.63%

-11.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-1.27%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-7.78%

-29.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

1.33%

+3.95%

Volatility

ALTFX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison

AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that ALTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALTFXRTXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

3.03%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

8.05%

+3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

10.79%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

15.83%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

20.07%

-2.02%

ALTFX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALTFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALTFX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison

ALTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.80%, more than RTXAX's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
12.80%13.53%8.18%0.03%2.61%9.99%7.23%6.01%8.36%0.00%4.05%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
2.46%2.86%2.05%1.98%3.11%1.74%1.71%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALTFX and RTXAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALTFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to RTXAX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALTFX dropped -80.01% vs RTXAX's -40.68%.

RTXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALTFX and RTXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer