ALTBG.PA vs. BCHN.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Blockchain Group (ALTBG.PA) and Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L).

BCHN.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 8, 2019.

Performance

ALTBG.PA vs. BCHN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in The Blockchain Group (ALTBG.PA) and Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALTBG.PA vs. BCHN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ALTBG.PA The Blockchain Group	0.00%	855.15%	118.75%
BCHN.L Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF	-5.99%	28.23%	13.94%

Different Trading Currencies

ALTBG.PA is traded in EUR, while BCHN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCHN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

ALTBG.PA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCHN.L

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: -5.99%
• 6M: -14.03%
• 1Y: 42.83%
• 3Y*: 29.83%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALTBG.PA vs. BCHN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHN.L

BCHN.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
BCHN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BCHN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BCHN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
BCHN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BCHN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALTBG.PA vs. BCHN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Blockchain Group (ALTBG.PA) and Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALTBG.PA	BCHN.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.53	—

Correlation

The correlation between ALTBG.PA and BCHN.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ALTBG.PA vs. BCHN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALTBG.PA nor BCHN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ALTBG.PA	BCHN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-61.69%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-31.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-28.79%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-23.96%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ALTBG.PA	BCHN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	42.98%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	37.80%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	35.81%	—