PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BCHN.L vs. AVGO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BCHN.L and AVGO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

BCHN.L vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
134.59%
763.44%
BCHN.L
AVGO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BCHN.L:

0.13

AVGO:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

BCHN.L:

0.48

AVGO:

1.14

Omega Ratio

BCHN.L:

1.06

AVGO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

BCHN.L:

0.13

AVGO:

1.06

Martin Ratio

BCHN.L:

0.45

AVGO:

2.92

Ulcer Index

BCHN.L:

12.21%

AVGO:

10.15%

Daily Std Dev

BCHN.L:

42.77%

AVGO:

57.77%

Max Drawdown

BCHN.L:

-61.69%

AVGO:

-48.30%

Current Drawdown

BCHN.L:

-27.51%

AVGO:

-28.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHN.L achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly higher than AVGO's -22.60% return.


BCHN.L

YTD

-5.21%

1M

-11.38%

6M

19.46%

1Y

6.09%

5Y*

18.22%

10Y*

N/A

AVGO

YTD

-22.60%

1M

-19.32%

6M

18.13%

1Y

34.72%

5Y*

50.50%

10Y*

33.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCHN.L vs. AVGO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHN.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCHN.L is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCHN.L is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCHN.L is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCHN.L is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCHN.L is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCHN.L is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AVGO is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AVGO is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AVGO is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AVGO is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AVGO is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AVGO is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BCHN.L vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCHN.L, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.041.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCHN.L, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.351.72
The chart of Omega ratio for BCHN.L, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.041.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCHN.L, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.042.11
The chart of Martin ratio for BCHN.L, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.135.69
BCHN.L
AVGO

The current BCHN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHN.L and AVGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
0.04
1.02
BCHN.L
AVGO

Dividends

BCHN.L vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

BCHN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BCHN.L
Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
1.12%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%1.22%

Drawdowns

BCHN.L vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHN.L drawdown since its inception was -61.69%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHN.L and AVGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
-31.55%
-22.10%
BCHN.L
AVGO

Volatility

BCHN.L vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) is 15.57%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 18.16%. This indicates that BCHN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
15.57%
18.16%
BCHN.L
AVGO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab