ALSRX vs. UMBHX
ALSRX (Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ALSRX charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
ALSRX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ALSRX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 29.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.08%
- 5Y*
- -3.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
UMBHX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALSRX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ALSRX Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund | 0.11% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALSRX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALSRX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
ALSRX
UMBHX
ALSRX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALSRX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALSRX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALSRX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -20.59 | +20.83 |
Drawdowns
ALSRX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALSRX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSRX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALSRX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.40% | -1.86% | -71.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.92% | -1.86% | -27.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.69% | -1.26% | -27.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.40% | — | — |
Volatility
ALSRX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALSRX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 6.22% | +18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 6.22% | +23.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 6.22% | +20.58% |
ALSRX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALSRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALSRX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
ALSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSRX Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund | 2.59% | 2.80% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.64% | 5.23% | 20.07% | 11.31% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ALSRX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for ALSRX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer