ALSRX vs. RFIMX
ALSRX (Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund) and RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ALSRX returned -3.66%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for RFIMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALSRX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for RFIMX.
Performance
ALSRX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALSRX achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than RFIMX's 14.50% return.
ALSRX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 29.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.08%
- 5Y*
- -3.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
RFIMX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 14.50%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 27.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
ALSRX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSRX Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund | 8.21% | 4.83% | 8.76% | 14.83% | -38.17% | -4.44% | 64.90% | 29.87% | -0.68% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 14.50% | 1.99% | 11.52% | 9.14% | -24.26% | 30.58% | 44.44% | 24.94% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALSRX and RFIMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ALSRX and RFIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALSRX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank
ALSRX
RFIMX
ALSRX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALSRX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALSRX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.11 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.89 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 8.17 | -3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALSRX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.00 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
ALSRX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALSRX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSRX and RFIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALSRX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.40% | -99.41% | +26.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.23% | -9.11% | -12.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.53% | -99.41% | +65.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.46% | -99.41% | +45.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.92% | -99.13% | +70.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.69% | -29.22% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.40% | 3.23% | +3.17% |
Volatility
ALSRX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison
Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALSRX) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) at 5.70%. This indicates that ALSRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALSRX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 5.70% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 13.64% | +5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 19.12% | +5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 5,369.96% | -5,340.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 4,403.88% | -4,377.08% |
ALSRX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALSRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALSRX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison
ALSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than RFIMX's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSRX Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund | 2.59% | 2.80% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.64% | 5.23% | 20.07% | 11.31% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 1.16% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 47.82% | 71.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALSRX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALSRX has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to RFIMX (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSRX dropped -73.40% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.
RFIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALSRX and RFIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer