PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALSRX vs. PNSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALSRX vs. PNSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALSRX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALSRX achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than PNSAX's 17.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ALSRX has underperformed PNSAX with an annualized return of 9.13%, while PNSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.


ALSRX

1D
0.05%
1M
6.39%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.50%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
-3.66%
10Y*
9.13%

PNSAX

1D
-0.93%
1M
1.30%
YTD
17.19%
6M
16.54%
1Y
30.06%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALSRX vs. PNSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALSRX
Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund
8.21%4.83%8.76%14.83%-38.17%-4.44%64.90%29.87%-4.03%24.83%
PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
17.19%8.91%22.98%22.87%-28.10%14.38%47.65%37.60%-2.46%20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ALSRX and PNSAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.92

The correlation between ALSRX and PNSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALSRX vs. PNSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALSRX
ALSRX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ALSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ALSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PNSAX
PNSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PNSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PNSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALSRX vs. PNSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALSRX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALSRXPNSAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

1.98

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.24

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.48

7.84

-3.36

ALSRX vs. PNSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALSRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the PNSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALSRX and PNSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALSRXPNSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.40

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.66

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.44

-0.19

Drawdowns

ALSRX vs. PNSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALSRX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, which is greater than PNSAX's maximum drawdown of -69.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSRX and PNSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALSRXPNSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.40%

-69.47%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.23%

-14.00%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.53%

-26.25%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.46%

-38.77%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.04%

-38.77%

-16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.92%

-3.21%

-25.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.69%

-23.56%

-5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.40%

3.99%

+2.41%

Volatility

ALSRX vs. PNSAX - Volatility Comparison

Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALSRX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) have volatilities of 8.08% and 7.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALSRXPNSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

7.91%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.11%

18.28%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

22.58%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.63%

23.22%

+6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.80%

23.58%

+3.22%

ALSRX vs. PNSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALSRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than PNSAX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALSRX vs. PNSAX - Dividend Comparison

ALSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than PNSAX's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ALSRX
Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund
2.59%2.80%1.99%0.00%0.00%23.64%5.23%20.07%11.31%0.00%0.00%
PNSAX
Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund
0.36%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.27%4.87%1.93%1.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALSRX and PNSAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALSRX has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to PNSAX (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSRX dropped -73.40% vs PNSAX's -69.47%.

PNSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALSRX and PNSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer