ALSRX vs. CMCIX
ALSRX (Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, ALSRX returned 29.99% vs 0.07% for CMCIX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALSRX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
ALSRX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALSRX achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 1.72% return.
ALSRX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 29.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.08%
- 5Y*
- -3.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
CMCIX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 0.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALSRX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSRX Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund | 8.21% | 4.83% | 8.76% | 9.37% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 1.72% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALSRX and CMCIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ALSRX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALSRX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
ALSRX
CMCIX
ALSRX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALSRX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALSRX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | -0.02 | +1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 0.08 | +1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.01 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | -0.04 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | -0.09 | +4.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALSRX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | -0.02 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.32 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
ALSRX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALSRX drawdown since its inception was -73.40%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSRX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALSRX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.40% | -21.50% | -51.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.23% | -11.68% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.92% | -10.79% | -18.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.69% | -6.44% | -22.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.40% | 4.98% | +1.42% |
Volatility
ALSRX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALSRX) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.89%. This indicates that ALSRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALSRX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 3.89% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | 10.55% | +8.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 15.16% | +9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 16.55% | +13.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 16.55% | +10.25% |
ALSRX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALSRX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALSRX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
ALSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than CMCIX's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSRX Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Fund | 2.59% | 2.80% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.64% | 5.23% | 20.07% | 11.31% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.18% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALSRX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALSRX has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to CMCIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSRX dropped -73.40% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
ALSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALSRX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer