ALMRX vs. VSNGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ALMRX (Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund) and VSNGX (JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ALMRX returned 12.59%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for VSNGX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ALMRX charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for VSNGX.

Performance

ALMRX vs. VSNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMRX achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than VSNGX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ALMRX has outperformed VSNGX with an annualized return of 12.59%, while VSNGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.50% annualized return.

ALMRX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 3.37%
• 1Y: 17.03%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 3.96%
• 10Y*: 12.59%

VSNGX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 6.74%
• 6M: 6.17%
• 1Y: 13.25%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMRX vs. VSNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund	4.75%	17.01%	20.02%	22.68%	-35.28%	6.17%	64.25%	29.79%	-7.77%	28.75%
VSNGX JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund	6.74%	6.09%	18.60%	16.15%	-16.03%	19.97%	22.62%	32.73%	-8.20%	21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMRX and VSNGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 1, 1997	0.41

Over the past year, ALMRX and VSNGX have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

ALMRX vs. VSNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMRX

ALMRX Risk / Return Rank: 13
ALMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ALMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ALMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ALMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ALMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

VSNGX

VSNGX Risk / Return Rank: 18
VSNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
VSNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
VSNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
VSNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
VSNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMRX vs. VSNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALMRX	VSNGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.06	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	1.61	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.19	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	1.59	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	5.93	-2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALMRX vs. VSNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the VSNGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMRX and VSNGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALMRX	VSNGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	1.06	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.39	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.59	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.53	-0.36

Drawdowns

ALMRX vs. VSNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMRX drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, which is greater than VSNGX's maximum drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMRX and VSNGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALMRX	VSNGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.80%	-54.50%	-19.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.06%	-8.24%	-7.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.71%	-18.96%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.01%	-25.08%	-38.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.01%	-38.33%	-25.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.35%	-0.35%	-32.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.21%	-7.43%	-14.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.98%	2.20%	+2.78%

Volatility

ALMRX vs. VSNGX - Volatility Comparison

Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX) at 2.81%. This indicates that ALMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSNGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALMRX	VSNGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	2.81%	+2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.64%	9.14%	+5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.03%	12.38%	+6.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.46%	17.40%	+31.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.78%	19.58%	+18.20%

ALMRX vs. VSNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALMRX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VSNGX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALMRX vs. VSNGX - Dividend Comparison

ALMRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VSNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	77.91%	12.19%	8.56%	7.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VSNGX JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund	5.76%	6.15%	8.60%	0.50%	2.81%	7.63%	11.65%	8.60%	12.95%	5.79%	3.37%	5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALMRX and VSNGX in my portfolio?

ALMRX and VSNGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALMRX or VSNGX?

ALMRX has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to VSNGX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMRX dropped -73.80% vs VSNGX's -54.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VSNGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.