ALMRX vs. CTIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX).
ALMRX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Nov 8, 1993. CTIGX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jul 31, 2019.
Performance
ALMRX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALMRX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund | -7.99% | 17.01% | 20.02% | 22.68% | -35.28% | 6.17% | 64.25% | -1.74% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | -5.11% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.64% | 58.94% | -3.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALMRX achieves a -7.99% return, which is significantly lower than CTIGX's -5.11% return.
ALMRX
- 1D
- 4.18%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- -7.99%
- 6M
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
CTIGX
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -11.56%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- 1Y
- 31.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALMRX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALMRX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ALMRX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank
ALMRX
CTIGX
ALMRX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALMRX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.17 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.68 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.60 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | 9.43 | -5.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALMRX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.17 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.16 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.38 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALMRX and CTIGX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ALMRX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison
ALMRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMRX Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 77.91% | 12.19% | 8.56% | 7.91% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 4.84% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ALMRX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALMRX drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMRX and CTIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALMRX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.80% | -46.26% | -27.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -11.56% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.01% | -46.26% | -17.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.58% | -11.56% | -29.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.14% | -19.06% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 3.19% | +1.53% |
Volatility
ALMRX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger MidCap Growth Institutional Fund (ALMRX) is 7.91%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that ALMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALMRX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.91% | 11.44% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 20.05% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 28.24% | -3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.59% | 26.74% | +21.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.73% | 29.03% | +8.70% |