ALMIX vs. FSPWX
ALMIX (Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund) and FSPWX (Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past year, ALMIX returned 4.44% vs 5.38% for FSPWX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALMIX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FSPWX.
Performance
ALMIX vs. FSPWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ALMIX having a 1.89% return and FSPWX slightly lower at 1.83%.
ALMIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
FSPWX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALMIX vs. FSPWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ALMIX Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund | 1.89% | 6.13% | 0.87% |
FSPWX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 1.83% | 6.76% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALMIX and FSPWX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ALMIX and FSPWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALMIX vs. FSPWX — Risk / Return Rank
ALMIX
FSPWX
ALMIX vs. FSPWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund (ALMIX) and Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALMIX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.29 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.43 | 2.67 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.83 | 8.19 | +11.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALMIX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 1.56 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 1.00 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
ALMIX vs. FSPWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALMIX drawdown since its inception was -6.61%, which is greater than FSPWX's maximum drawdown of -3.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMIX and FSPWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALMIX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -3.84% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.80% | -1.95% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -0.98% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 0.64% | -0.42% |
Volatility
ALMIX vs. FSPWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund (ALMIX) is 0.56%, while Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSPWX) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that ALMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALMIX | FSPWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 0.92% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.26% | 2.28% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81% | 3.35% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.19% | 4.06% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.70% | 4.06% | -1.36% |
ALMIX vs. FSPWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALMIX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPWX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALMIX vs. FSPWX - Dividend Comparison
ALMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than FSPWX's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALMIX Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund | 4.34% | 4.38% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 7.59% | 4.38% | 1.19% | 2.17% | 2.80% | 2.19% | 1.53% | 0.09% |
FSPWX Fidelity SAI Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 3.76% | 4.19% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALMIX and FSPWX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPWX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to ALMIX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMIX dropped -6.61% vs FSPWX's -3.84%.
ALMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALMIX and FSPWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer