PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALLW vs. THIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ALLW vs. THIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ALLW vs. THIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
5.38%15.04%
THIR
THOR Index Rotation ETF
-3.26%28.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than THIR's -3.26% return.


ALLW

1D
0.42%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
5.38%
6M
8.07%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

THIR

1D
0.51%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
-3.26%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ALLW vs. THIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than THIR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ALLW vs. THIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

THIR
THIR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
THIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
THIR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
THIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
THIR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. THIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALLWTHIRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

2.07

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

2.97

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.94

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

13.15

-3.09

ALLW vs. THIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the THIR Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLW and THIR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALLWTHIRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.07

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

1.25

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and THIR is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ALLW vs. THIR - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than THIR's 0.36% yield.


TTM20252024
ALLW
SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.44%4.67%0.00%
THIR
THOR Index Rotation ETF
0.36%0.35%0.29%

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. THIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum THIR drawdown of -10.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and THIR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLWTHIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-10.05%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-8.88%

+0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-6.14%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-1.90%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.99%

+0.04%

Volatility

ALLW vs. THIR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) at 4.54%. This indicates that ALLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ALLWTHIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

4.54%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

9.20%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

12.49%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.81%

12.84%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.81%

12.84%

-0.03%