ALLW vs. THIR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ALLW (State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF) and THIR (THOR Index Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ALLW is actively managed, while THIR is passively managed. Over the past year, ALLW returned 17.58% vs 20.08% for THIR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ALLW charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for THIR.

Performance

ALLW vs. THIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than THIR's 5.00% return.

ALLW

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -2.41%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 5.04%
• 1Y: 17.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

THIR

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 3.87%
• 1Y: 20.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLW vs. THIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	5.97%	15.44%
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF	5.00%	27.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and THIR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.47

The correlation between ALLW and THIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ALLW vs. THIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW

ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 50
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 57

THIR

THIR Risk / Return Rank: 48
THIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
THIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
THIR Omega Ratio Rank: 48
THIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
THIR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. THIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALLW	THIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.59	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.21	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.29	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.27	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.71	7.82	+1.89

ALLW vs. THIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the THIR Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLW and THIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. THIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum THIR drawdown of -10.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and THIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALLW	THIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-10.05%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-8.88%	+1.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.73%	-3.34%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-2.01%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	2.57%	-0.76%

Volatility

ALLW vs. THIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) is 4.00%, while THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that ALLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALLW	THIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	6.50%	-2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	10.20%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.05%	12.77%	-1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.71%	13.27%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.71%	13.27%	-0.56%

ALLW vs. THIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALLW has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than THIR's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ALLW vs. THIR - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, more than THIR's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.41%	4.67%	0.00%
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF	0.34%	0.35%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALLW and THIR in my portfolio?

ALLW and THIR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALLW or THIR?

THIR has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to ALLW (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALLW dropped -8.78% vs THIR's -10.05%.

Which ETF is better, ALLW or THIR?

On 1-year performance, THIR leads with 20.08% vs 17.58% for ALLW. On fees, THIR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, ALLW has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ALLW or THIR?

Over the 1-year period, THIR has performed better with a 20.08% return vs 17.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ALLW or THIR?

THIR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ALLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ALLW or THIR?

ALLW has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.34% for THIR.

What is the main difference between ALLW and THIR?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ALLW and 0.70% for THIR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.