PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALLW vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALLW vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLW achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.67% return.


ALLW

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
7.24%
6M
7.64%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
0.71%
1M
1.36%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
0.35%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLW vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ALLW
State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF
7.24%15.44%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-2.67%0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ALLW and BRK-B is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALLW vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLW
ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLW vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALLWBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.01

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

-0.02

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.87

-0.05

+10.92

ALLW vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLW and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALLW vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLW drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLW and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLWBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.78%

-53.86%

+45.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-9.42%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-9.36%

+6.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-11.07%

+9.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

4.53%

-2.76%

Volatility

ALLW vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.95%. This indicates that ALLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALLWBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.95%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

10.78%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

14.38%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

17.12%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.72%

19.44%

-6.72%

Dividends

ALLW vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
ALLW
State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF
4.36%4.67%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALLW and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALLW has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to BRK-B (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALLW dropped -8.78% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

ALLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALLW and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer