ALIBX vs. FSRKX
ALIBX (ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund) and FSRKX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, ALIBX returned 7.55%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for FSRKX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALIBX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FSRKX.
Performance
ALIBX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALIBX achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 8.80% return.
ALIBX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
FSRKX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 16.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
ALIBX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALIBX ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund | 7.75% | 12.89% | 14.89% | 16.01% | -16.24% | 15.50% | 8.25% |
FSRKX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 | 8.80% | 10.59% | 6.00% | 4.81% | -3.13% | 16.06% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALIBX and FSRKX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2020 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ALIBX and FSRKX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALIBX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank
ALIBX
FSRKX
ALIBX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALIBX | FSRKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.73 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 8.79 | -5.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.77 | 32.89 | -19.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALIBX | FSRKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 3.61 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.95 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
ALIBX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALIBX drawdown since its inception was -20.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FSRKX drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALIBX and FSRKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALIBX | FSRKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.38% | -19.93% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -1.93% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -5.84% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.38% | -12.74% | -7.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.72% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -3.21% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 0.51% | +1.05% |
Volatility
ALIBX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund (ALIBX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.33%. This indicates that ALIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALIBX | FSRKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 1.33% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.10% | 3.67% | +3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.86% | 4.71% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 6.94% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.01% | 7.79% | +3.22% |
ALIBX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALIBX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALIBX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison
ALIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, more than FSRKX's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALIBX ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity Fund | 8.45% | 9.14% | 10.61% | 1.37% | 1.08% | 0.56% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
FSRKX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 | 4.25% | 4.83% | 4.98% | 5.38% | 7.38% | 5.43% | 2.31% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALIBX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALIBX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FSRKX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALIBX dropped -20.38% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.
FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALIBX and FSRKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer