ALFAX vs. UMBHX
ALFAX (Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ALFAX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
ALFAX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ALFAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
UMBHX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALFAX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ALFAX Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund | -0.31% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALFAX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALFAX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
ALFAX
UMBHX
ALFAX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALFAX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.87 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALFAX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.79 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
ALFAX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALFAX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALFAX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALFAX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.11% | -1.86% | -55.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -0.84% | -12.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | — | — |
Volatility
ALFAX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALFAX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 30.30% | -13.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 30.30% | -10.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 30.30% | -9.58% |
ALFAX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALFAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALFAX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
ALFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALFAX Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund | 4.47% | 5.30% | 0.80% | 0.46% | 6.94% | 5.38% | 7.99% | 14.66% | 16.61% | 11.96% | 11.85% | 15.83% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ALFAX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for ALFAX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer