PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALFAX vs. MISGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALFAX vs. MISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALFAX achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly higher than MISGX's 3.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ALFAX has outperformed MISGX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while MISGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.


ALFAX

1D
0.76%
1M
4.83%
YTD
18.69%
6M
18.13%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
10.51%

MISGX

1D
-0.86%
1M
3.10%
YTD
3.86%
6M
4.98%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALFAX vs. MISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
18.69%8.80%13.18%13.92%-23.50%15.01%26.16%24.95%-9.72%20.61%
MISGX
Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund
3.86%-1.28%13.89%14.02%-24.63%8.55%27.78%18.96%0.40%22.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ALFAX and MISGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2013

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between ALFAX and MISGX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALFAX vs. MISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALFAX
ALFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ALFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ALFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

MISGX
MISGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALFAX vs. MISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALFAXMISGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

0.83

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

1.26

+1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.14

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.07

+2.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.75

3.24

+9.51

ALFAX vs. MISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the MISGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALFAX and MISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALFAXMISGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

0.83

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

-0.01

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.42

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.44

0.00

Drawdowns

ALFAX vs. MISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALFAX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than MISGX's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALFAX and MISGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALFAXMISGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-41.11%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-13.54%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-27.23%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-37.70%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

-41.11%

+0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-9.29%

+8.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-11.29%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

4.27%

-1.60%

Volatility

ALFAX vs. MISGX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund (MISGX) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALFAXMISGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

5.89%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

12.46%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

17.52%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.86%

21.36%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

21.23%

-0.51%

ALFAX vs. MISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALFAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MISGX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALFAX vs. MISGX - Dividend Comparison

ALFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than MISGX's 7.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
4.47%5.30%0.80%0.46%6.94%5.38%7.99%14.66%16.61%11.96%11.85%15.83%
MISGX
Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund
7.59%7.89%3.76%0.00%14.39%33.08%1.96%5.78%12.50%4.18%0.00%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALFAX and MISGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MISGX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to ALFAX (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALFAX dropped -57.11% vs MISGX's -41.11%.

ALFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALFAX and MISGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer