PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALFAX vs. LHYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALFAX vs. LHYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALFAX achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than LHYAX's 1.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ALFAX has outperformed LHYAX with an annualized return of 11.33%, while LHYAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.59% annualized return.


ALFAX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.98%
YTD
22.34%
6M
19.97%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
11.33%

LHYAX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.38%
6M
2.15%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
4.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALFAX vs. LHYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
22.34%8.80%13.18%13.92%-23.50%15.01%26.16%24.95%-9.72%20.61%
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
1.38%7.44%7.25%9.84%-14.97%6.16%4.56%15.11%-5.10%8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ALFAX and LHYAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1998

0.43

The correlation between ALFAX and LHYAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALFAX vs. LHYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALFAX
ALFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ALFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ALFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LHYAX
LHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALFAX vs. LHYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) and Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ALFAXLHYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.36

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

10.56

+3.07

ALFAX vs. LHYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the LHYAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALFAX and LHYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ALFAX vs. LHYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALFAX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than LHYAX's maximum drawdown of -31.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALFAX and LHYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALFAXLHYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-31.68%

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-3.02%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-4.87%

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-18.67%

-15.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.29%

-24.23%

-16.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.48%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-3.07%

-9.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

0.67%

+2.03%

Volatility

ALFAX vs. LHYAX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund (ALFAX) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that ALFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LHYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALFAXLHYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

0.95%

+5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

2.82%

+11.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

3.68%

+14.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

5.10%

+14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

5.72%

+15.07%

ALFAX vs. LHYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALFAX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LHYAX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALFAX vs. LHYAX - Dividend Comparison

ALFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than LHYAX's 7.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALFAX
Lord Abbett Alpha Strategy Fund
4.34%5.30%0.80%0.46%6.94%5.38%7.99%14.66%16.61%11.96%11.85%15.83%
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
7.23%7.13%6.02%5.84%4.60%4.91%5.15%5.47%6.29%5.65%5.85%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALFAX and LHYAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALFAX has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to LHYAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALFAX dropped -57.11% vs LHYAX's -31.68%.

ALFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALFAX and LHYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer