ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE
ALC0.DE (21Shares Algorand ETP) and XLME.DE (21Shares Stellar ETP) are both Cryptocurrency funds from 21Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ALC0.DE returned -15.06%/yr vs 25.76%/yr for XLME.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 2.50% expense ratio.
Performance
ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALC0.DE achieves a -9.66% return, which is significantly lower than XLME.DE's -2.01% return.
ALC0.DE
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- -12.14%
- YTD
- -9.66%
- 6M
- -22.02%
- 1Y
- -47.46%
- 3Y*
- -15.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLME.DE
- 1D
- -6.58%
- 1M
- 30.88%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -15.33%
- 1Y
- -24.44%
- 3Y*
- 25.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALC0.DE 21Shares Algorand ETP | -9.66% | -69.17% | 40.48% | 38.07% | -79.03% |
XLME.DE 21Shares Stellar ETP | -2.01% | -45.22% | 165.66% | 71.95% | -65.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALC0.DE and XLME.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ALC0.DE and XLME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ALC0.DE
XLME.DE
ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Algorand ETP (ALC0.DE) and 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALC0.DE | XLME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.00 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.37 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | -0.55 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALC0.DE | XLME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | -0.34 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | -0.10 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALC0.DE drawdown since its inception was -91.38%, which is greater than XLME.DE's maximum drawdown of -82.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALC0.DE and XLME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALC0.DE | XLME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.38% | -82.74% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.56% | -70.51% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.32% | -78.28% | -9.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.02% | -68.57% | -20.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.41% | -62.68% | -11.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.32% | 47.90% | +2.42% |
Volatility
ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 21Shares Algorand ETP (ALC0.DE) is 20.62%, while 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE) has a volatility of 32.82%. This indicates that ALC0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALC0.DE | XLME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.62% | 32.82% | -12.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.56% | 51.83% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.05% | 78.47% | -3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.03% | 88.68% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.03% | 88.68% | +0.35% |
ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ALC0.DE and XLME.DE have an expense ratio of 2.50%.
Dividends
ALC0.DE vs. XLME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALC0.DE nor XLME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALC0.DE and XLME.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 2.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ALC0.DE and XLME.DE have the same expense ratio: 2.50% per year.
Find the right allocation for ALC0.DE and XLME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer