ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE
ALC0.DE (21Shares Algorand ETP) and CIWP.DE (CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ALC0.DE returned -15.06%/yr vs -21.43%/yr for CIWP.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ALC0.DE charges 2.50%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIWP.DE.
Performance
ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALC0.DE achieves a -9.66% return, which is significantly higher than CIWP.DE's -54.69% return.
ALC0.DE
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- -12.14%
- YTD
- -9.66%
- 6M
- -22.02%
- 1Y
- -47.46%
- 3Y*
- -15.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIWP.DE
- 1D
- -7.37%
- 1M
- -21.15%
- YTD
- -54.69%
- 6M
- -52.29%
- 1Y
- -59.04%
- 3Y*
- -21.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALC0.DE 21Shares Algorand ETP | -9.66% | -69.17% | 40.48% | 38.07% | -75.76% |
CIWP.DE CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP | -54.69% | -60.70% | 82.28% | 43.15% | -29.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALC0.DE and CIWP.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ALC0.DE and CIWP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ALC0.DE
CIWP.DE
ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Algorand ETP (ALC0.DE) and CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALC0.DE | CIWP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.91 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.77 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.97 | -1.16 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALC0.DE | CIWP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | -0.65 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | -0.25 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALC0.DE drawdown since its inception was -91.38%, which is greater than CIWP.DE's maximum drawdown of -86.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALC0.DE and CIWP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALC0.DE | CIWP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.38% | -86.95% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.56% | -77.55% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.32% | -86.95% | -0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.02% | -86.95% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.41% | -48.11% | -26.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.32% | 51.24% | -0.92% |
Volatility
ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 21Shares Algorand ETP (ALC0.DE) is 20.62%, while CoinShares Physical Uniswap EUR ETP (CIWP.DE) has a volatility of 22.07%. This indicates that ALC0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIWP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALC0.DE | CIWP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.62% | 22.07% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.56% | 55.47% | -3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.05% | 91.32% | -16.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.03% | 94.63% | -5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.03% | 94.63% | -5.60% |
ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALC0.DE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CIWP.DE's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALC0.DE vs. CIWP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALC0.DE nor CIWP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALC0.DE and CIWP.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIWP.DE is cheaper at 1.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIWP.DE is cheaper with a 1.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ALC0.DE.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ALC0.DE and 1.50% for CIWP.DE.
Find the right allocation for ALC0.DE and CIWP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer