PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Algoma Central Corporation (ALC.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALC.TO achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than HBIL.TO's 0.59% return.


ALC.TO

1D
0.54%
1M
2.16%
YTD
20.11%
6M
19.04%
1Y
44.74%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
14.29%

HBIL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.53%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALC.TO
Algoma Central Corporation
20.11%33.98%4.37%
HBIL.TO
Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
0.59%3.05%-1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ALC.TO and HBIL.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024

0.02

The correlation between ALC.TO and HBIL.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALC.TO
ALC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ALC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ALC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIL.TO
HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Algoma Central Corporation (ALC.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALC.TOHBIL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.03

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

9.74

-1.57

ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALC.TO and HBIL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALC.TOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.74

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.64

-0.56

Drawdowns

ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALC.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.53%, which is greater than HBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALC.TO and HBIL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALC.TOHBIL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.53%

-1.69%

-92.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.25%

-0.95%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.59%

-0.31%

-6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.66%

-0.48%

-52.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

0.30%

+5.20%

Volatility

ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Algoma Central Corporation (ALC.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) at 0.62%. This indicates that ALC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALC.TOHBIL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.53%

0.62%

+7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.17%

1.24%

+18.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.74%

1.66%

+22.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.44%

2.03%

+17.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

2.03%

+20.32%

Dividends

ALC.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

ALC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than HBIL.TO's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALC.TO
Algoma Central Corporation
3.68%4.23%5.14%13.85%3.73%3.99%22.63%8.90%3.08%2.00%2.29%2.00%
HBIL.TO
Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
6.52%7.49%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALC.TO and HBIL.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALC.TO and HBIL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer