PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAG.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than XMBR.L's 9.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ALAG.L having a 8.49% annualized return and XMBR.L not far ahead at 8.80%.


ALAG.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-6.14%
YTD
10.55%
6M
7.97%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
8.49%

XMBR.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
-11.96%
YTD
9.05%
6M
3.14%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
10.55%44.31%-25.31%25.10%21.74%-8.24%-16.56%12.56%-1.55%12.30%
XMBR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C
9.05%38.26%-28.61%25.42%25.85%-17.12%-21.96%20.39%4.70%12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAG.L and XMBR.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.94

The correlation between ALAG.L and XMBR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ALAG.L
XMBR.L

Financial Services

30.3%
33.2%

Basic Materials

19.7%
13.7%

Energy

11.7%
18.9%

Industrials

10.8%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
4.2%

Utilities

8.5%
12.7%

Communication Services

4.0%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Healthcare

1.4%
2.2%

Technology

0.7%
1.1%

Financial Services

ALAG.L
30.3%
XMBR.L
33.2%

Basic Materials

ALAG.L
19.7%
XMBR.L
13.7%

Energy

ALAG.L
11.7%
XMBR.L
18.9%

Industrials

ALAG.L
10.8%
XMBR.L
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

ALAG.L
9.9%
XMBR.L
4.2%

Utilities

ALAG.L
8.5%
XMBR.L
12.7%

Communication Services

ALAG.L
4.0%
XMBR.L
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ALAG.L
1.6%
XMBR.L
1.3%

Real Estate

ALAG.L
1.6%
XMBR.L

-

Healthcare

ALAG.L
1.4%
XMBR.L
2.2%

Technology

ALAG.L
0.7%
XMBR.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAG.L
ALAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XMBR.L
XMBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XMBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XMBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALAG.LXMBR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.14

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

7.28

+3.54

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the XMBR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAG.L and XMBR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALAG.LXMBR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.63

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.22

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.28

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.09

+0.30

Drawdowns

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum XMBR.L drawdown of -72.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAG.L and XMBR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALAG.LXMBR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-72.01%

+23.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-16.06%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-29.72%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-30.62%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.94%

-53.50%

+4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-16.06%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-27.83%

+15.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

4.73%

-1.17%

Volatility

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) is 4.67%, while Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that ALAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALAG.LXMBR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

5.57%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

17.44%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

21.08%

-3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

25.88%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.89%

31.26%

-6.37%

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMBR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAG.L nor XMBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAG.L and XMBR.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMBR.L.

ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while XMBR.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ALAG.L and 0.65% for XMBR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAG.L and XMBR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer