ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L
ALAG.L (Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD) and XMBR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C) are both Latin America Equities funds - ALAG.L tracks the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD while XMBR.L tracks the MSCI Brazil NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ALAG.L returned 8.49%/yr vs 8.80%/yr for XMBR.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALAG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XMBR.L.
Performance
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALAG.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than XMBR.L's 9.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ALAG.L having a 8.49% annualized return and XMBR.L not far ahead at 8.80%.
ALAG.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 7.97%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
XMBR.L
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -11.96%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 34.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAG.L Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD | 10.55% | 44.31% | -25.31% | 25.10% | 21.74% | -8.24% | -16.56% | 12.56% | -1.55% | 12.30% |
XMBR.L Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C | 9.05% | 38.26% | -28.61% | 25.42% | 25.85% | -17.12% | -21.96% | 20.39% | 4.70% | 12.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALAG.L and XMBR.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ALAG.L and XMBR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Basic Materials
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Energy
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Industrials
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Consumer Defensive
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Utilities
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Communication Services
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Consumer Cyclical
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Real Estate
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
-
Healthcare
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Technology
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L — Risk / Return Rank
ALAG.L
XMBR.L
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALAG.L | XMBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 2.14 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | 7.28 | +3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALAG.L | XMBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.63 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.22 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.28 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.09 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALAG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum XMBR.L drawdown of -72.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAG.L and XMBR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALAG.L | XMBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.94% | -72.01% | +23.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.63% | -16.06% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.74% | -29.72% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -30.62% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.94% | -53.50% | +4.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.63% | -16.06% | +5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -27.83% | +15.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 4.73% | -1.17% |
Volatility
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) is 4.67%, while Xtrackers MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF 1C (XMBR.L) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that ALAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALAG.L | XMBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 5.57% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 17.44% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 21.08% | -3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 25.88% | -5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 31.26% | -6.37% |
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMBR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALAG.L vs. XMBR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAG.L nor XMBR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALAG.L and XMBR.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ALAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ALAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMBR.L.
ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while XMBR.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ALAG.L and 0.65% for XMBR.L.
Find the right allocation for ALAG.L and XMBR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer