PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAG.L vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ALAG.L is traded in GBp, while VNQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VNQ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ALAG.L having a 10.55% return and VNQ slightly lower at 10.21%. Over the past 10 years, ALAG.L has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 8.49%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.26% annualized return.


ALAG.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-6.14%
YTD
10.55%
6M
7.97%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
8.49%

VNQ

1D
1.79%
1M
1.28%
YTD
10.21%
6M
8.17%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
6.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
10.55%44.31%-25.31%25.10%21.74%-8.24%-16.56%12.56%-1.55%12.30%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
10.21%-4.11%6.64%6.26%-17.48%41.87%-7.41%24.01%-0.45%-4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAG.L and VNQ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.21

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ALAG.L
VNQ

Financial Services

30.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

19.7%
1.1%

Energy

11.7%
0.1%

Industrials

10.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%

-

Utilities

8.5%

-

Communication Services

4.0%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%

-

Real Estate

1.6%
97.3%

Healthcare

1.4%

-

Technology

0.7%
0.3%

Financial Services

ALAG.L
30.3%
VNQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

ALAG.L
19.7%
VNQ
1.1%

Energy

ALAG.L
11.7%
VNQ
0.1%

Industrials

ALAG.L
10.8%
VNQ
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

ALAG.L
9.9%
VNQ

-

Utilities

ALAG.L
8.5%
VNQ

-

Communication Services

ALAG.L
4.0%
VNQ
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ALAG.L
1.6%
VNQ

-

Real Estate

ALAG.L
1.6%
VNQ
97.3%

Healthcare

ALAG.L
1.4%
VNQ

-

Technology

ALAG.L
0.7%
VNQ
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAG.L vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAG.L
ALAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALAG.LVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.17

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

1.72

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

4.83

+5.99

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAG.L and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALAG.LVNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

0.99

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.21

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.30

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.28

+0.12

Drawdowns

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -57.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAG.L and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALAG.LVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-57.05%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-7.44%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-18.24%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-28.76%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.94%

-35.51%

-13.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-3.66%

-6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-10.79%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.64%

+0.92%

Volatility

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 3.55%. This indicates that ALAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALAG.LVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

3.55%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

9.55%

+5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

12.93%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

17.60%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.89%

20.61%

+4.28%

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ALAG.L vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

ALAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.63%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAG.L and VNQ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ALAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ALAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

ALAG.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VNQ is REIT. ALAG.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ALAG.L and 0.13% for VNQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAG.L and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer