PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ALAG.L is traded in GBp, while MHL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MHL.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAG.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than MHL.DE's -19.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ALAG.L has underperformed MHL.DE with an annualized return of 8.49%, while MHL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.


ALAG.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
-6.14%
YTD
10.55%
6M
7.97%
1Y
38.67%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
8.49%

MHL.DE

1D
3.54%
1M
1.32%
YTD
-19.60%
6M
-15.27%
1Y
-16.83%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
15.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
10.55%44.31%-25.31%25.10%21.74%-8.24%-16.56%12.56%-1.55%12.30%
MHL.DE
S&P Global Inc
-19.60%-1.00%16.66%24.50%-19.90%51.02%11.01%57.46%6.27%40.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAG.L and MHL.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.11

The correlation between ALAG.L and MHL.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAG.L
ALAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MHL.DE
MHL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MHL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MHL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) and S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALAG.LMHL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.90

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

-0.52

+4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

-1.07

+11.89

ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the MHL.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAG.L and MHL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALAG.LMHL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

-0.65

+2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.18

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.86

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.32

-0.93

Drawdowns

ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAG.L drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, which is greater than MHL.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAG.L and MHL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALAG.LMHL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-34.02%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-32.77%

+22.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-34.02%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-34.02%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.94%

-34.02%

-14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-26.30%

+15.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.08%

-9.47%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

15.88%

-12.32%

Volatility

ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD (ALAG.L) is 4.67%, while S&P Global Inc (MHL.DE) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that ALAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALAG.LMHL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

9.54%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

23.10%

-8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.38%

26.24%

-8.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

24.63%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.89%

32.38%

-7.49%

Dividends

ALAG.L vs. MHL.DE - Dividend Comparison

ALAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MHL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ALAG.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America UCITS ETF-C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MHL.DE
S&P Global Inc
0.78%0.65%0.77%0.72%0.85%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALAG.L and MHL.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAG.L and MHL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer