ALAFY.PA vs. FBGRX
ALAFY.PA (AFYREN SAS) is a stock, while FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, ALAFY.PA returned -21.19%/yr vs 25.07%/yr for FBGRX. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ALAFY.PA vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ALAFY.PA is traded in EUR, while FBGRX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FBGRX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALAFY.PA achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 14.98% return.
ALAFY.PA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 23.01%
- 3Y*
- -21.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -18.03%
FBGRX
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 25.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.41%
ALAFY.PA vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAFY.PA AFYREN SAS | -0.71% | 27.85% | 10.05% | -65.69% | -33.18% | 20.22% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 14.98% | 5.68% | 48.99% | 50.94% | -34.64% | 8.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALAFY.PA and FBGRX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALAFY.PA vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
ALAFY.PA
FBGRX
ALAFY.PA vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AFYREN SAS (ALAFY.PA) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALAFY.PA | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 2.41 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 8.29 | -6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALAFY.PA vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALAFY.PA drawdown since its inception was -84.71%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAFY.PA and FBGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALAFY.PA | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.71% | -45.08% | -39.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.15% | -11.38% | -19.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.00% | -31.61% | -43.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.27% | -5.75% | -64.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.18% | -8.74% | -46.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 3.30% | +8.66% |
Volatility
ALAFY.PA vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
AFYREN SAS (ALAFY.PA) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.21%. This indicates that ALAFY.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALAFY.PA | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.58% | 6.21% | +5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.06% | 14.38% | +23.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.65% | 19.22% | +36.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.08% | 24.67% | +32.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.08% | 23.95% | +33.13% |
Dividends
ALAFY.PA vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
ALAFY.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAFY.PA AFYREN SAS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 1.70% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALAFY.PA and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ALAFY.PA and FBGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer