ALAB vs. RKLB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ALAB (Astera Labs, Inc.) and RKLB (Rocket Lab USA, Inc.) are both stocks. ALAB operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while RKLB operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past year, ALAB returned 309.17% vs 302.95% for RKLB. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ALAB vs. RKLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 120.70% return, which is significantly higher than RKLB's 46.77% return.

ALAB

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 57.79%
• YTD: 120.70%
• 6M: 146.66%
• 1Y: 309.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RKLB

• 1D: -10.79%
• 1M: -17.94%
• YTD: 46.77%
• 6M: 66.51%
• 1Y: 302.95%
• 3Y*: 158.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAB vs. RKLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc.	120.70%	25.60%	152.00%
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc.	46.77%	173.89%	527.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and RKLB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024	0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALAB : $66.51B RKLB : $61.99B
EPS ALAB : $1.48 RKLB : -$0.33
PS Ratio ALAB : 66.09 RKLB : 83.69
PB Ratio ALAB : 44.52 RKLB : 27.38
Total Revenue (TTM) ALAB : $1.00B RKLB : $679.58M
Gross Profit (TTM) ALAB : $760.99M RKLB : $248.43M
EBITDA (TTM) ALAB : $253.12M RKLB : -$177.36M

Return for Risk

ALAB vs. RKLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAB

ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 91
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

RKLB

RKLB Risk / Return Rank: 93
RKLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
RKLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
RKLB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
RKLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RKLB Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAB vs. RKLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ALAB	RKLB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	3.12	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.13	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.38	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.84	6.74	-1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	15.44	-5.90

ALAB vs. RKLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the RKLB Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and RKLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. RKLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum RKLB drawdown of -82.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and RKLB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALAB	RKLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.69%	-82.96%	+19.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.19%	-43.01%	-17.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-55.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-31.84%	+31.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.48%	-51.29%	+21.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.50%	18.75%	+11.75%

Volatility

ALAB vs. RKLB - Volatility Comparison

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) have volatilities of 32.05% and 31.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALAB	RKLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.05%	31.54%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.52%	73.47%	-2.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.04%	93.03%	+3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.49%	81.62%	+11.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.49%	81.62%	+11.87%

Dividends

ALAB vs. RKLB - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAB nor RKLB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALAB vs. RKLB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Astera Labs, Inc. and Rocket Lab USA, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ALAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

RKLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 76.49M and revenue of 200.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.

ALAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

RKLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported an operating income of -55.97M and revenue of 200.35M, resulting in an operating margin of -27.9%.

ALAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

RKLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported a net income of -45.02M and revenue of 200.35M, resulting in a net margin of -22.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALAB and RKLB in my portfolio?

ALAB and RKLB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALAB or RKLB?

ALAB has higher volatility (32.05%) compared to RKLB (31.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs RKLB's -82.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RKLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.