PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AKWA.DE) and Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AKWA.DE
Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF
2.37%0.80%12.17%20.84%-4.94%
CAUT.DE
Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-0.16%27.42%9.31%-35.25%-26.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKWA.DE achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than CAUT.DE's -0.16% return.


AKWA.DE

1D
1.96%
1M
-5.80%
YTD
2.37%
6M
0.60%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
10.40%
5Y*
10Y*

CAUT.DE

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
-6.22%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
-1.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AKWA.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CAUT.DE's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKWA.DE
AKWA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AKWA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKWA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKWA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AKWA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKWA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CAUT.DE
CAUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AKWA.DE) and Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AKWA.DECAUT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.32

0.90

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

1.31

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.75

-1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.89

3.62

-1.73

AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKWA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKWA.DE and CAUT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AKWA.DECAUT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.90

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

-0.28

+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between AKWA.DE and CAUT.DE is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AKWA.DE nor CAUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKWA.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.07%, smaller than the maximum CAUT.DE drawdown of -69.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKWA.DE and CAUT.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AKWA.DECAUT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.07%

-69.24%

+46.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-17.11%

+6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.96%

-44.33%

+38.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-45.76%

+38.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

7.67%

-4.52%

Volatility

AKWA.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AKWA.DE) is 5.32%, while Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that AKWA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AKWA.DECAUT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

7.58%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

21.70%

-12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

29.86%

-13.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

33.34%

-17.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

33.34%

-17.26%