AKRE vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AKRE (Akre Focus ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AKRE charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

AKRE vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Akre Focus ETF (AKRE) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AKRE

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: -16.27%
• 6M: -14.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKRE vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AKRE Akre Focus ETF	0.37%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AKRE and GRW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.70

Return for Risk

AKRE vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akre Focus ETF (AKRE) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AKRE	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.42	13.58	-15.00

Drawdowns

AKRE vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKRE drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKRE and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AKRE	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.18%	-0.45%	-23.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.98%	-0.27%	-18.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.07%	-0.17%	-12.90%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AKRE	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.97%	8.89%	+12.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.97%	8.89%	+12.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.97%	8.89%	+12.08%

AKRE vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AKRE has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AKRE vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither AKRE nor GRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AKRE and GRW in my portfolio?

AKRE and GRW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AKRE or GRW?

On fees, GRW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AKRE or GRW?

GRW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for AKRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AKRE or GRW?

AKRE and GRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AKRE and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Akre Capital and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AKRE and 0.75% for GRW.