AKRE vs. FUMB
AKRE (Akre Focus ETF) and FUMB (First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AKRE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Akre Capital, while FUMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. AKRE charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FUMB.
Performance
AKRE vs. FUMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKRE achieves a -19.94% return, which is significantly lower than FUMB's 1.32% return.
AKRE
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- -19.94%
- 6M
- -20.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUMB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- —
AKRE vs. FUMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AKRE Akre Focus ETF | -19.94% | -3.06% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 1.32% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKRE and FUMB is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKRE vs. FUMB — Risk / Return Rank
AKRE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FUMB
AKRE vs. FUMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akre Focus ETF (AKRE) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AKRE | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 12.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 45.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AKRE vs. FUMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKRE drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, which is greater than FUMB's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKRE and FUMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKRE | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -2.68% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.53% | -0.07% | -22.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.59% | -0.19% | -13.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
AKRE vs. FUMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKRE | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.56% | 0.78% | +19.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 1.17% | +19.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 1.76% | +18.80% |
AKRE vs. FUMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AKRE has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AKRE vs. FUMB - Dividend Comparison
AKRE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKRE Akre Focus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 3.02% | 2.90% | 2.86% | 2.24% | 1.02% | 0.43% | 0.94% | 1.74% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AKRE and FUMB have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for AKRE.
FUMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.00% for AKRE.
AKRE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FUMB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Akre Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AKRE and 0.45% for FUMB.
Find the right allocation for AKRE and FUMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer