AKO-A vs. QQ.L
AKO-A (Embotelladora Andina S.A) and QQ.L (QinetiQ Group plc) are both stocks. AKO-A operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while QQ.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, AKO-A returned 9.65%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for QQ.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AKO-A vs. QQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AKO-A is traded in USD, while QQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKO-A achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than QQ.L's 7.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AKO-A having a 9.65% annualized return and QQ.L not far behind at 9.23%.
AKO-A
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 19.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
QQ.L
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 14.75%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- -6.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
AKO-A vs. QQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKO-A Embotelladora Andina S.A | -0.38% | 69.94% | 22.39% | 32.28% | 25.25% | -15.56% | -9.03% | -14.12% | -25.96% | 33.08% |
QQ.L QinetiQ Group plc | 7.41% | 16.51% | 34.93% | -6.83% | 22.49% | -15.85% | -5.88% | 32.93% | 19.94% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKO-A and QQ.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
AKO-A:
$3.30B
QQ.L:
£2.47B
AKO-A:
CLP 1.95K
QQ.L:
-£0.14
AKO-A:
0.00
QQ.L:
0.67
AKO-A:
0.00
QQ.L:
4.47
AKO-A:
CLP 3.42T
QQ.L:
£3.85B
AKO-A:
CLP 1.34T
QQ.L:
£372.10M
AKO-A:
CLP 620.88B
QQ.L:
£533.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKO-A vs. QQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
AKO-A
QQ.L
AKO-A vs. QQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) and QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AKO-A | QQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.99 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | -0.22 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | -0.46 | +2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AKO-A vs. QQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKO-A drawdown since its inception was -79.18%, which is greater than QQ.L's maximum drawdown of -61.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKO-A and QQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKO-A | QQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.18% | -61.16% | -18.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.40% | -27.17% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.41% | -32.62% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -33.81% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.51% | -43.00% | -20.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.90% | -16.76% | +2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.91% | -20.64% | -10.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.27% | 13.21% | -3.94% |
Volatility
AKO-A vs. QQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) at 11.53%. This indicates that AKO-A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKO-A | QQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.32% | 11.53% | +6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.91% | 23.14% | +18.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.47% | 31.96% | +20.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.49% | 32.45% | +10.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.04% | 31.01% | +11.03% |
Dividends
AKO-A vs. QQ.L - Dividend Comparison
AKO-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than QQ.L's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKO-A Embotelladora Andina S.A | 4.59% | 5.24% | 6.95% | 9.27% | 17.81% | 8.12% | 5.74% | 4.72% | 4.16% | 2.63% | 2.34% | 2.50% |
QQ.L QinetiQ Group plc | 1.91% | 2.00% | 1.99% | 2.49% | 2.04% | 2.59% | 2.06% | 1.84% | 2.20% | 2.60% | 2.17% | 1.99% |
Financials
AKO-A vs. QQ.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Embotelladora Andina S.A and QinetiQ Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AKO-A vs. QQ.L - Profitability Comparison
AKO-A - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a gross profit of 393.07B and revenue of 958.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
QQ.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
AKO-A - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported an operating income of 147.46B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
QQ.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
AKO-A - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a net income of 102.93B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
QQ.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AKO-A and QQ.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AKO-A and QQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer