AKO-A vs. GPN
AKO-A (Embotelladora Andina S.A) and GPN (Global Payments Inc.) are both stocks. AKO-A operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while GPN operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, AKO-A returned 9.65%/yr vs -0.28%/yr for GPN. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AKO-A vs. GPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AKO-A achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than GPN's -11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, AKO-A has outperformed GPN with an annualized return of 9.65%, while GPN has yielded a comparatively lower -0.28% annualized return.
AKO-A
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 19.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
GPN
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -16.89%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- -11.36%
- 5Y*
- -18.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.28%
AKO-A vs. GPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKO-A Embotelladora Andina S.A | -0.38% | 69.94% | 22.39% | 32.28% | 25.25% | -15.56% | -9.03% | -14.12% | -25.96% | 33.08% |
GPN Global Payments Inc. | -11.90% | -30.11% | -10.97% | 29.02% | -25.91% | -36.91% | 18.51% | 77.25% | 2.92% | 44.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AKO-A and GPN is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2001 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
AKO-A:
CLP 1.95K
GPN:
-$3.90
AKO-A:
0.00
GPN:
1.39
AKO-A:
CLP 3.42T
GPN:
$8.83B
AKO-A:
CLP 1.34T
GPN:
$4.25B
AKO-A:
CLP 620.88B
GPN:
$2.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AKO-A vs. GPN — Risk / Return Rank
AKO-A
GPN
AKO-A vs. GPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) and Global Payments Inc. (GPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AKO-A | GPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.98 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | -0.41 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | -0.81 | +2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AKO-A vs. GPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKO-A drawdown since its inception was -79.18%, which is greater than GPN's maximum drawdown of -70.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKO-A and GPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AKO-A | GPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.18% | -70.17% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.40% | -29.95% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.41% | -53.95% | +28.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -66.52% | +41.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.51% | -70.17% | +6.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.90% | -67.54% | +53.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.91% | -18.90% | -12.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.27% | 14.92% | -5.65% |
Volatility
AKO-A vs. GPN - Volatility Comparison
Embotelladora Andina S.A (AKO-A) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to Global Payments Inc. (GPN) at 13.23%. This indicates that AKO-A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AKO-A | GPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.32% | 13.23% | +5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.91% | 30.58% | +11.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.47% | 39.63% | +12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.49% | 36.64% | +5.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.04% | 34.55% | +7.49% |
Dividends
AKO-A vs. GPN - Dividend Comparison
AKO-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than GPN's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AKO-A Embotelladora Andina S.A | 4.59% | 5.24% | 6.95% | 9.27% | 17.81% | 8.12% | 5.74% | 4.72% | 4.16% | 2.63% | 2.34% | 2.50% |
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.85% | 1.29% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Financials
AKO-A vs. GPN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Embotelladora Andina S.A and Global Payments Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AKO-A vs. GPN - Profitability Comparison
AKO-A - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a gross profit of 393.07B and revenue of 958.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
GPN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AKO-A - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported an operating income of 147.46B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
GPN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
AKO-A - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A reported a net income of 102.93B and revenue of 958.49B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
GPN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AKO-A and GPN have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AKO-A has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to GPN (13.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKO-A dropped -79.18% vs GPN's -70.17%.
AKO-A currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AKO-A and GPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer