PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKAM vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AKAM vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKAM achieves a 53.01% return, which is significantly higher than KO's 18.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AKAM having a 9.75% annualized return and KO not far behind at 9.55%.


AKAM

1D
0.79%
1M
-11.52%
YTD
53.01%
6M
55.45%
1Y
73.31%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
9.75%

KO

1D
0.11%
1M
2.23%
YTD
18.99%
6M
17.96%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKAM vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
53.01%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%11.48%21.54%41.42%-6.09%-2.46%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
18.99%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AKAM and KO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1999

0.19

The correlation between AKAM and KO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AKAM:

$20.03B

KO:

$356.42B

EPS

AKAM:

$2.95

KO:

$3.18

PE Ratio

AKAM:

45.19

KO:

26.01

PS Ratio

AKAM:

4.61

KO:

7.23

PB Ratio

AKAM:

4.08

KO:

10.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

AKAM:

$4.27B

KO:

$49.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AKAM:

$2.44B

KO:

$30.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

AKAM:

$1.14B

KO:

$18.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKAM vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKAM vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AKAMKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.19

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.26

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

4.51

+4.58

AKAM vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the KO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKAM and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AKAM vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKAM drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAM and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKAMKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-68.23%

-31.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

-7.87%

-17.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.84%

-16.26%

-30.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-17.27%

-29.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-36.99%

-9.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.25%

-1.16%

-58.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.59%

-16.09%

-66.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

3.98%

+3.75%

Volatility

AKAM vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) has a higher volatility of 15.13% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.70%. This indicates that AKAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKAMKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.13%

6.70%

+8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.95%

12.87%

+35.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.31%

16.73%

+37.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.61%

16.18%

+20.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.47%

18.24%

+16.23%

Dividends

AKAM vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

AKAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
1.88%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%

Financials

AKAM vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
1.07B
12.47B
(AKAM) Total Revenue
(KO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AKAM vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%62.0%64.0%20222023202420252026
56.1%
63.0%
Portfolio components
AKAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 602.31M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

AKAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.49M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

AKAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 106.32M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AKAM and KO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to KO (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKAM dropped -99.80% vs KO's -68.23%.

AKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKAM and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer