PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKAM vs. FJTSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKAM achieves a 53.01% return, which is significantly higher than FJTSY's -24.83% return. Over the past 10 years, AKAM has underperformed FJTSY with an annualized return of 9.75%, while FJTSY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.80% annualized return.


AKAM

1D
0.79%
1M
-17.15%
YTD
53.01%
6M
55.45%
1Y
70.04%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
9.75%

FJTSY

1D
-3.78%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
-24.83%
6M
-23.54%
1Y
-14.63%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
18.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
53.01%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%11.48%21.54%41.42%-6.09%-2.46%
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
-24.83%55.98%17.49%12.77%-22.86%19.18%54.48%49.76%-12.38%29.23%

Correlation

The correlation between AKAM and FJTSY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007

0.21

The correlation between AKAM and FJTSY shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AKAM:

$20.03B

FJTSY:

$35.63B

EPS

AKAM:

$2.95

FJTSY:

¥257.52

PE Ratio

AKAM:

45.19

FJTSY:

12.75

PS Ratio

AKAM:

4.61

FJTSY:

1.63

PB Ratio

AKAM:

4.08

FJTSY:

2.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

AKAM:

$4.27B

FJTSY:

¥3.55T

Gross Profit (TTM)

AKAM:

$2.44B

FJTSY:

¥1.32T

EBITDA (TTM)

AKAM:

$1.14B

FJTSY:

¥439.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKAM vs. FJTSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FJTSY
FJTSY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FJTSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJTSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJTSY Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FJTSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJTSY Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AKAMFJTSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.97

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

-0.44

+3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

-0.95

+10.04

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the FJTSY Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKAM and FJTSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKAM drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than FJTSY's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKAM and FJTSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AKAMFJTSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-62.04%

-37.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

-33.59%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.84%

-33.59%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-47.55%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-47.55%

+0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.25%

-29.49%

-29.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.59%

-22.75%

-59.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

15.45%

-7.72%

Volatility

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Volatility Comparison

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) and Fujitsu Ltd ADR (FJTSY) have volatilities of 15.13% and 14.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AKAMFJTSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.13%

14.50%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.95%

35.10%

+12.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.31%

43.39%

+10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.61%

33.88%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.47%

31.83%

+2.64%

Dividends

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Dividend Comparison

Neither AKAM nor FJTSY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FJTSY
Fujitsu Ltd ADR
0.00%0.36%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%1.30%1.30%

Financials

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Fujitsu Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20222023202420252026
1.07B
1.07T
(AKAM) Total Revenue
(FJTSY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AKAM values in USD, FJTSY values in JPY

AKAM vs. FJTSY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Fujitsu Ltd ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
56.1%
42.8%
Portfolio components
AKAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 602.31M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

FJTSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 458.88B and revenue of 1.07T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

AKAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.49M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

FJTSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 154.67B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

AKAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 106.32M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

FJTSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fujitsu Ltd ADR reported a net income of 107.66B and revenue of 1.07T, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AKAM and FJTSY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to FJTSY (14.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AKAM dropped -99.80% vs FJTSY's -62.04%.

AKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AKAM and FJTSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer