PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AJUL vs. APRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AJUL vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AJUL achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 6.27% return.


AJUL

1D
0.05%
1M
0.69%
YTD
3.08%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRW

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.28%
YTD
6.27%
6M
7.02%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AJUL vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AJUL and APRW is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.85

The correlation between AJUL and APRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AJUL vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AJUL
AJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

APRW
APRW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AJUL vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AJULAPRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

2.23

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

16.82

-12.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.50

86.04

-61.54

AJUL vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is lower than the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AJUL and APRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AJULAPRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

4.83

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

1.15

+0.46

Drawdowns

AJUL vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AJUL drawdown since its inception was -6.06%, smaller than the maximum APRW drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJUL and APRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AJULAPRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-9.61%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.19%

-0.75%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-1.12%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.15%

+0.22%

Volatility

AJUL vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026 (AJUL) is 0.17%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) has a volatility of 0.60%. This indicates that AJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AJULAPRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.17%

0.60%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

1.84%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

2.62%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

6.72%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

6.41%

-1.41%

AJUL vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRW's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

AJUL vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither AJUL nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AJUL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To July 2026
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APRW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


AJUL and APRW have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APRW has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to AJUL (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJUL dropped -6.06% vs APRW's -9.61%.

On 1-year performance, APRW leads with 12.59% vs 9.05% for AJUL. On fees, APRW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, AJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APRW has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APRW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJUL.

AJUL and APRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AJUL and 0.74% for APRW.

APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AJUL and APRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer