AJAN vs. CAOS
AJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AJAN returned 4.98% vs 1.57% for CAOS. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
AJAN vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AJAN achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.69% return.
AJAN
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.30%
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 1.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $92.46K | $76.38K | $85.38K | |
| $7.12M | $5.43M | $4.97M |
AJAN vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 | 2.59% | 6.12% | 7.61% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.69% | 2.55% | 5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between AJAN and CAOS is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2024 | -0.12 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between AJAN and CAOS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.12 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AJAN vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
AJAN
CAOS
AJAN vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AJAN | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.20 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.08 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.69 | 4.56 | +6.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AJAN vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AJAN and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AJAN | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -3.89% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.24% | -0.76% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.19% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.30% | -0.92% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 0.35% | +0.12% |
Volatility
AJAN vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2026 (AJAN) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.44%. This indicates that AJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AJAN | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 0.44% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.40% | 1.07% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57% | 1.57% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 4.17% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 4.17% | -0.40% |
AJAN vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
AJAN vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
Neither AJAN nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AJAN and CAOS have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AJAN has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to CAOS (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AJAN dropped -4.11% vs CAOS's -3.89%.
On 1-year performance, AJAN leads with 4.98% vs 1.57% for CAOS. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AJAN has performed better with a 4.98% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AJAN.
AJAN and CAOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AJAN and 0.63% for CAOS.
AJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AJAN and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer