AIYY vs. ZHDG
AIYY (YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF) and ZHDG (ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AIYY returned -57.47% vs 18.31% for ZHDG. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for ZHDG.
Performance
AIYY vs. ZHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIYY achieves a -24.26% return, which is significantly lower than ZHDG's 5.12% return.
AIYY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- -24.26%
- 6M
- -29.50%
- 1Y
- -57.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZHDG
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIYY vs. ZHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.26% | -58.98% | -14.74% | -1.63% |
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 5.12% | 14.34% | 18.02% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIYY and ZHDG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIYY vs. ZHDG — Risk / Return Rank
AIYY
ZHDG
AIYY vs. ZHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIYY | ZHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | 1.79 | -2.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | 2.50 | -4.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.32 | -0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.15 | -2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 8.97 | -10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIYY | ZHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.07 | 1.79 | -2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.83 | 0.51 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
AIYY vs. ZHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIYY drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than ZHDG's maximum drawdown of -23.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIYY and ZHDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIYY | ZHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.48% | -23.27% | -56.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.33% | -8.56% | -59.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.26% | -0.60% | -74.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -8.16% | -32.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.63% | 2.05% | +45.58% |
Volatility
AIYY vs. ZHDG - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) has a higher volatility of 15.67% compared to ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) at 2.80%. This indicates that AIYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIYY | ZHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.67% | 2.80% | +12.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.16% | 8.06% | +31.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.83% | 10.27% | +43.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.52% | 11.75% | +38.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.52% | 11.75% | +38.77% |
AIYY vs. ZHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHDG's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIYY vs. ZHDG - Dividend Comparison
AIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 158.78%, more than ZHDG's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | 158.78% | 168.33% | 98.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF | 2.44% | 2.57% | 2.59% | 1.52% | 3.58% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIYY and ZHDG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIYY has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to ZHDG (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIYY dropped -79.48% vs ZHDG's -23.27%.
On 1-year performance, ZHDG leads with 18.31% vs -57.47% for AIYY. On fees, ZHDG is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, ZHDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZHDG has performed better with a 18.31% return vs -57.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZHDG is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AIYY.
AIYY has the higher dividend yield at 158.78%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ZEGA. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AIYY and 0.98% for ZHDG.
ZHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIYY and ZHDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer