AIYY vs. GPIX
AIYY (YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AIYY returned -57.47% vs 25.55% for GPIX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
AIYY vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIYY achieves a -24.26% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 9.91% return.
AIYY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- -24.26%
- 6M
- -29.50%
- 1Y
- -57.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIYY vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | -24.26% | -58.98% | -14.74% | -1.63% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 9.91% | 16.25% | 21.77% | 4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIYY and GPIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between AIYY and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIYY vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
AIYY
GPIX
AIYY vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIYY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.48 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 3.33 | -4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 16.77 | -17.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIYY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.07 | 2.52 | -3.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.83 | 1.78 | -2.61 |
Drawdowns
AIYY vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIYY drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIYY and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIYY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.48% | -17.50% | -61.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.33% | -7.71% | -60.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.26% | -0.48% | -74.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -1.48% | -39.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.63% | 1.53% | +46.10% |
Volatility
AIYY vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF (AIYY) has a higher volatility of 15.67% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 2.26%. This indicates that AIYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIYY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.67% | 2.26% | +13.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.16% | 7.89% | +31.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.83% | 10.17% | +43.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.52% | 13.80% | +36.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.52% | 13.80% | +36.72% |
AIYY vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIYY vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
AIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 158.78%, more than GPIX's 8.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIYY YieldMax AI Option Income Strategy ETF | 158.78% | 168.33% | 98.26% | 0.00% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.00% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIYY and GPIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIYY has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIYY dropped -79.48% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 25.55% vs -57.47% for AIYY. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 25.55% return vs -57.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AIYY.
AIYY has the higher dividend yield at 158.78%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AIYY and 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIYY and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer