PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. KTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AIVL vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AIVL vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
0.94%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%2.84%
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
-12.39%21.01%16.13%-10.41%-26.12%-29.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -12.39% return.


AIVL

1D
1.87%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
0.94%
6M
2.05%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
7.41%

KTEC

1D
2.85%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-12.39%
6M
-25.44%
1Y
-12.67%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AIVL vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

KTEC
KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIVLKTECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

-0.41

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

-0.39

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.95

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

-0.42

+1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.83

-1.00

+3.83

AIVL vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and KTEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIVLKTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

-0.41

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

-0.25

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and KTEC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AIVL vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than KTEC's 3.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.59%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
3.83%3.36%0.27%0.81%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and KTEC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLKTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-66.90%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-29.36%

+17.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-44.71%

+38.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-43.97%

+36.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

12.39%

-9.64%

Volatility

AIVL vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) is 4.85%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that AIVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AIVLKTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

9.77%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

19.86%

-11.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

31.06%

-15.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

43.59%

-28.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

43.59%

-26.27%