PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly lower than IWS's 17.05% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVL has underperformed IWS with an annualized return of 8.63%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.68% annualized return.


AIVL

1D
0.65%
1M
3.58%
YTD
13.15%
6M
12.55%
1Y
19.01%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
8.63%

IWS

1D
0.69%
1M
3.76%
YTD
17.05%
6M
15.46%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVL vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
13.15%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.57%13.77%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
17.05%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and IWS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

0.92

The correlation between AIVL and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIVL vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
IWS

Technology

21.3%
18.7%

Financial Services

17.9%
13.7%

Industrials

15.5%
16.2%

Healthcare

12.0%
7.6%

Utilities

8.9%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
4.7%

Basic Materials

4.6%
5.3%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
8.5%

Energy

3.1%
7.4%

Real Estate

1.5%
8.3%

Technology

AIVL
21.3%
IWS
18.7%

Financial Services

AIVL
17.9%
IWS
13.7%

Industrials

AIVL
15.5%
IWS
16.2%

Healthcare

AIVL
12.0%
IWS
7.6%

Utilities

AIVL
8.9%
IWS
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
7.8%
IWS
4.7%

Basic Materials

AIVL
4.6%
IWS
5.3%

Communication Services

AIVL
4.2%
IWS
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.1%
IWS
8.5%

Energy

AIVL
3.1%
IWS
7.4%

Real Estate

AIVL
1.5%
IWS
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVLIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.90

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

14.62

-4.82

AIVL vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, roughly equal to the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-62.40%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-7.53%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-20.57%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-21.23%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

-43.83%

+2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.16%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-8.00%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.00%

-0.06%

Volatility

AIVL vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) is 3.96%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that AIVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

4.18%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

10.04%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

13.55%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

17.32%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

19.39%

-2.02%

AIVL vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVL vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than IWS's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.42%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.33%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AIVL and IWS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWS has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to AIVL (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs IWS's -62.40%.

On 10-year performance, IWS leads with 10.68% vs 8.63% for AIVL. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, AIVL has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWS has performed better with a 10.68% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AIVL.

AIVL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.33% for IWS.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.23% for IWS.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer