AIVC vs. TSXU
AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AIVC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIVC charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
AIVC vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 57.90% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 102.89% return.
AIVC
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- 6M
- 49.97%
- YTD
- 57.90%
- 1Y
- 99.15%
- 3Y*
- 42.39%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
TSXU
- 1D
- -7.43%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 83.88%
- YTD
- 102.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIVC vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF | 57.90% | 7.01% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 102.89% | 37.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIVC and TSXU is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIVC vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
AIVC
TSXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIVC vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIVC | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.27 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIVC vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIVC | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.11% | -35.62% | -20.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.18% | -17.97% | +4.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.35% | -10.87% | -5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.16% | — | — |
Volatility
AIVC vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIVC | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.57% | 90.45% | -56.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.03% | 90.45% | -59.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 90.45% | -63.16% |
AIVC vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIVC vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than TSXU's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.38% | 0.92% | 0.64% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.73% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIVC and TSXU have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.11% for AIVC.
AIVC is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for AIVC and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer